stitcherLogoCreated with Sketch.
Get Premium Download App
Listen
Discover
Premium
Shows
Likes
Merch

Listen Now

Discover Premium Shows Likes

Type Theory Forall

27 Episodes

136 minutes | Jan 16, 2023
#26 Mechanizing Modern Mathematics - Kevin Buzzard
Kevin Buzzard has been very passionate spreading the word among mathematicians to use theorem provers mechanize theorems of modern mathematics. In this conversation we will talk about his vision in teaching undergrads to use the Lean theorem prover, what is the Xena Project, his view of how theorem provers can change the way we do mathematics, and much more! Links Xena’s Project Twitter Xena Project’s Website Lean’s Website
62 minutes | Nov 21, 2022
#25 Formally Verifying the Tezos Codebase - Formal Land
In this episode we partner with Formal Land, a company that works in formally verifying the Tezos codebase! I have worked with them in the past developing new features to their source-to-source compiler CoqOfOcaml. In this episode we talk about their work with Tezos and how their techniques are applicable to other codebases as well! For this we talk with Formal Land founder Guillaume Claret and the proof engineers Daniel Hilst and Pierre Vial. Links Formal Land Website Formal Land Email: contact@formal.land Formal Land Twitter: @LandFooBar CoqOfOcaml The DAO hack
98 minutes | Oct 6, 2022
#24 The History of Isabelle - Lawrence Paulson
In this episode we interview Lawrence Paulson, one of the creating fathers of Isabelle. We talk about the development process, how it drew inspirations and ideas from LCF and Boyer Moore. What tools were used, it’s strenghts and weaknesses, and all about the historical context at the time! We also briefly talk about his formalization of the Gödel’s Incompletenes theorems in Isabelle Paulson have quite an extensive CV, he is a professor at Cambridge, have published more than 100 papers, is an ACM fellow since 2008, is a member of the royal society since 2017, among many other things! Links Larry’s Website Larry’s Twitter Larry’s Blog
72 minutes | Sep 24, 2022
#23 What is the SIGPLAN? - Jens Palsberg and Jonathan Aldrich
In this episode we talk about Sigplan, the organization behind the most important conferences and proceedings in our field. What is the SIGPLAN? What exactly does it do? How is it organized? How are things published? To answer these and many other questions we talk with Jens Palsberg, a professor at UCLA, who is the past chair of the SIGPLAN. And also Jonathan Aldrich, a professor at the CMU, who is a member of the ACM publication board. Links Jen’s Website Jonathan’s Website Jonathan’s Twitter Sigplan Blog Post on Hybrid Conferences SIGPlAN-M Mentoring Program
139 minutes | Aug 12, 2022
#22 Impredicativity, LEM, Realizability and more - Cody Roux
In this episode Cody Roux teaches some interesting concepts that people care about in Mathematics and Logic as a way to try to understand what is going on in the universe around us! In particular we will try to explain concepts such as Impredicativity, Excluded Middle, Group Theory, Model Theory, Kripke Models, Realizability, The Markov Principle, Cut Elimination, and other stuff! Links Cody’s website Cody’s dblp
187 minutes | Aug 4, 2022
#21 Denotational Design - Conal Elliott
In this episode Conal Elliott gives a more concrete presentation on what is Denotational Design is and how to use it in practice. It is a continuation of episode #17, in which we had an in-depth philosophical conversation to explain why he believes that Denotational Design is a superior form of reasoning in the realm of computer science. We also continue a discussion raised by Dan Ghica on the last episode on the need for Operational Semantics and the role of elegance in reasoning and design. Along the way we also address the questions sent by the listeners in these last episodes. Links Conal’s website Play/work with Conal Conal’s twitter: @conal The simple essence of automatic differentiation Compiling to categories Generic parallel functional programming Denotational design with type class morphisms Quotes “A theory appears beautiful or elegant […] when it’s simple; in other words when it can be expressed very concisely in terms of mathematics that we’ve already learned for some other reasons.” - Murray Gell-Mann, Beauty and Elegance in Physics. “In Galileo’s time, professors of philosophy and theology—the subjects were inseparable—produced grand discourses on the nature of reality, the structure of the universe, and the way the world works, all based on sophisticated metaphysical arguments. Meanwhile, Galileo measured how fast balls roll down inclined planes. How mundane! But the learned discourses, while grand, were vague. Galileo’s investigations were clear and precise. The old metaphysics never progressed, while Galileo’s work bore abundant, and at length spectacular, fruit. Galileo too cared about the big questions, but he realized that getting genuine answers requires patience and humility before the facts.” - Frank Wilczek, (The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces) “We must make here a clear distinction between belief and faith, because, in general practice, belief has come to mean a state of mind which is almost the opposite of faith. Belief, as I use the word here, is the insistence that the truth is what one would ‘lief’ or wish it to be. The believer will open his mind to the truth on the condition that it fits in with his preconceived ideas and wishes. Faith, on the other hand, is an unreserved opening of the mind to the truth, whatever it may turn out to be. Faith has no preconceptions; it is a plunge into the unknown. Belief clings, but faith lets go. In this sense of the word, faith is the essential virtue of science, and likewise of any religion that is not self-deception.” - Alan Watts (The Wisdom of Insecurity: A Message for an Age of Anxiety)
97 minutes | Jun 27, 2022
#20 Huaweii, String Diagrams, Game Semantics - Dan R. Ghica
In this episode, me and Eric Bond have a great conversation with Dan R. Ghica, a professor at Birmingham University and Director of the Programming Language Research Lab of the Huaweii Research Centre Edinburgh. We talk about his work on both institutions, which includes topics such as Category Theory, String Diagrams, and Game Semantics. We also briefly discuss the current publication process of our field and entertain some thoughts on how to make it better. Finally, we touch on more personal topics such as his views about Elegance, making an insightful counterpoint to Conal’s opinions on Denotational Semantics vs. Operational Semantics. Links Dan’s Twitter: @danghica Dan’s Website Job advert for Huawei positions Talks and Lectures Dan’s talk on Syntactic Trinitarianism (terms, graphs, diagrams) Dan’s talk on a similar, more semantics-oriented talk at TERMGRAPH Dan’s OPLSS course on (denotational) game semantics Game semantics lectures Papers Paper on string diagrams and their applications to reverse automatic differentiation (long paper, part of it to appear in FSCD 2020) Paper on automatic differentiation and string diagrams Paper on effect handlers Paper on optimisation with constructive reals Paper on digital circuits and string diagrams Paper on functorial boxes for string diagrams A Game semantics paper mentioned during the conversation Decidability via game semantics Landmark paper on undecidability of observational equivalence Other Links Penrose book Book on type-level string diagrams Proof assistant for higher categories The Programming Journal Midlands Graduate School
112 minutes | Jun 4, 2022
#19 Experience Report: Learning Coq - Patrick and Supun
In today’s episode I invite two friends of mine Patrick Lafontaine and Supun Abeysinghe. We will talk about their experience learning Coq and we guide ourselves in a survey that I gave all the 83 students in the class. The class was thought by my advisor Benjamin Delaware and I was his TA. Patrick researches compilers and have done work in particular with Rust. And Supun works more along the lines of machine learning in the context of systems.
170 minutes | May 19, 2022
#18 Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems - Cody Roux
In this episode Cody Roux talks about the Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems. We go through it’s underlying historical context, Hilbert’s Program, how it relates with Turing, Church, Von Neumann, Termination and more. Links Cody’s website Cody’s dblp The Lady or the Tiger? - Short Story The Lady or the Tiger? - Amazon Logicomix An Introduction to Gödel’s Theorems Jeremy Avigad’s Lecture Notes
213 minutes | May 9, 2022
#17 The Lost Elegance of Computation - Conal Elliott
In this episode I had the pleasure to have an in-depth conversation with Conal Elliott about his life, his work, his philosophy and his many opinions about research and the current state of PL Research and how it lead him to come with the concept of Denotational Design. Conal got his PhD at CMU in the 90s under Frank Pfenning working on Higher-Order Unification, after that he has devoted his life on thinking and refining graphic computation and the tools behind it. Links Conal’s website Play/work with Conal Conal’s twitter: @conal The simple essence of automatic differentiation Compiling to categories Generic parallel functional programming Denotational design with type class morphisms Functional Images Functional Reactive Animation Alphabet Versus the Goddess - Leonard Shlain The information - James Gleick Murray Gell-Mann’s definition of beauty/elegance: “A theory appears beautiful or elegant […] when it’s simple; in other words when it can be expressed very concisely in terms of mathematics that we’ve already learned for some other reasons.” A John Backus quote (from his Turing Award lecture): “Many creative computer scientists have retreated from inventing languages to inventing tools for describing them. Unfortunately, they have been largely content to apply their elegant new tools to studying the warts and moles of existing languages. After examining the appalling type structure of conventional languages, using the elegant tools developed by Dana Scott, it is surprising that so many of us remain passively content with that structure instead of energetically searching for new ones.”
96 minutes | Apr 2, 2022
#16 Agda, K Axiom, HoTT, Rewrite Theory - Jesper Cockx
in this episode we interview Jesper Cockx, one of the core developers on Agda. We talk about the philosophy behind Agda, his work on pattern matching, the Uniqueness of Identity of Proofs, UIP for short, and why it is inconsistent with Homotopy Type Theory. Links Jesper’s Website Jesper’s Twitter: @agdakx Jesper’s PhD Thesis Rewrite Theory paper Pattern matching without K paper (Check his website for more) EuroProofNet WITS Talks on Youtube (Workshop on the Implementation of Type Systems) Agda Zulip Agda Mailing List Ataca Github Wadler’s book on Agda Stump’s book on Agda
78 minutes | Mar 27, 2022
#15 Coq Projects, Agda, Idris, Kind - Nitin and Eric
In this episode me, Eric and Nitin continues our conversation started in the last episode. This time we move our attention to the cool projects happening in Coq, in particular commenting through the projects mentioned in Andrew Appel’s keynote “Coq’s Vibrant Ecosystem for verification engineering” that took place in CPP’22 which is colocated with POPL and towards the end we also talk about agda, idris and Kind. Links Nitin Twitter @NitinJohnRaj2 Eric Twitter @EricBond10 Appel’s CPP Talk Proof Assistants Stack Exchange Coq Community Leo de Moura Interview
57 minutes | Feb 12, 2022
#14 POPL, Parametricity, Scala, DOT - Nitin and Eric
In this episode I gather with two good friends Eric and Nitin to randomly talk random subjects that pops up. Among them we talked about POPL, Scala, Isabelle, Parametricity, Dependent Object Types (DOT, for short) and more! Links Nitin Twitter @NitinJohnRaj2 Eric Twitter @EricBond10 Collection of links on logical relations Theorems for Free Reynolds Paper Practical Foundations for Programming Languages
100 minutes | Dec 23, 2021
#13 C/C++, Emacs, Haskell, and Coq. The Journey - John Wiegley
This episode is about the journey of a programmer that converted himself into a Haskell developer after working with C/C++ for more than 10years. Here are a few questions that you’ll find the answer to in this episode: What does he find so compelling about Haskell? Why did it make him dive deeper into the Theoretical Computer Science? Why did it make him learn Coq and Category Theory? How does Coq compare with ACL2? How do both Coq and ACL2 compares to TLA+? Did learning Coq make John a better programmer? Links John’s Email: johnw@newartisans.com John’s Twitter: @jwiegley
66 minutes | Nov 10, 2021
#12 Tenure, Sexism and ADHD - Talia Ringer
Talia Ringer is an Assistant Professor at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She did her PhD at University of Washington with her thesis on Proof Repair. She’s very active on twitter @taliaringer. And in this episode we will talk about her transition from PhD to Professor, her work on diversity, her ADHD and how it has affected her career so far, and we also touch on the delicate topic of sexism in academia. Links Talia’s Twitter Sigplan Mentoring TIL: a type-directed, optimizing compiler for ML Neuro Divergent in CS Neuro Divergent in CS - Slack Overblur
67 minutes | Oct 4, 2021
#11 FP, Monads, GHC, and beyond - Alejandro Serrano
In this episode we have talk with Alejandro Serrano Mena, he works on 47 degrees and is a published author of two books about Haskell: The Book of Monads and Practical Haskell. We talk about many interesting features behind functional programming such as adts, pattern matching, impredicativity, monads, effects, hacking the ghc and how all this comes together to grab industry attention to adopt functional programming features over the past decade. Links Our new twitter @ttforall Alejandro’s twitter Book of Monads Practical Haskell The Haskell Interlude Tweag’s youtube channel on the GHC
77 minutes | Jul 15, 2021
#10 Classical Logic vs Intuitionistic Logic - Thorsten Altenkirch and Anupam Das
In this episode we host a discussion between Anupam Das and Thorsten Altenkirch on the role of constructivism in mathematics, logic and computer science. Anupam is a lecturer in the University of Birmingham in the UK, and Thorsten Altenkirch is a CS Professor at the University of Nottingham. We discuss why constructive content in proofs matters, the law of excluded middle, the axiom of choice, category theory, and much more! Links Thorsten’s website Anupam’s website Thorsten’s Book on Python The Proof Theory Blog High School Algebra Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
57 minutes | May 28, 2021
#9 Logic and Proof Theory - Anupam Das
In this episode I interview Anupam Das we have a nice conversation on the historical perspective of how Logic and Proof Theory as we know today came about in the 30’s. The differences between Natural Deduction and Sequent Calculus, Cut Elimination and much more. Links Anupam Das The Proof Theory Blog Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Anupam’s Talk on Cyclic Arithmetic
66 minutes | May 11, 2021
#8 Cedille - Chris Jenkins
In this episode I have a nice conversation with Chris Jenkins to talk about the Cedille theorem prover, based on a very concise type theory called CDLE. The main selling point of Cedille is that the theory is so small that the typing rules fit one page. And yet it is strong enough to do relevant theorem proving. This is probably the most technical episode so far. Links Leroy Jenkins Cedille Cast The Iowa Type Theory Commute Cedille Page Github Page
81 minutes | Apr 16, 2021
#7 Hacking Isabelle's Internals - Daniel Matichuk
In this episode we dive into Isabelle, the interactive theorem prover based on Higher Order Logic directly from someone who spent quite some time hacking on its internals. Me and Daniel also talk about Mizar, Isar, the seL4, and how it is formalized. Torwards the end of the episode we also talk a little about his current work on the binary analysis of Aarch32 Arm Archtecture at Galois.
COMPANY
About us Careers Stitcher Blog Help
AFFILIATES
Partner Portal Advertisers Podswag Stitcher Originals
Privacy Policy Terms of Service Your Privacy Choices
© Stitcher 2023