Listen Now

This protocol for detectives on how to design, operate and manage a cold case unit was written by Dr. Jim and is intended to serve as a supplement to the NIJ Best Practices guide that was discussed in a previous podcast. It is here that the steps needed to put in place, operate and manage a sound dedicated cold case unit are described. Phase I the design of the unit; Phase II the operational aspects of how the cold case unit should function; and Phase III the managerial responsibilities of the supervisor for the unit. 

In this episode Dr. Jim will discuss the issues and concerns surrounding uncertain or equivocal deaths where the manner of death may be in question.  The most common one seen surround the cases where a suicide comes under scrutiny and families believe it is a homicide.  Other possibilities exist with Homicide versus Accident or Suicide versus Accident.  In a general sense Dr. Jim will describe how some of these cases, at least by perception if not fact, become questionable and how they can cause us more time and money then if due diligence had been seen from the onset of the investigation.  As a side note, one of the cases briefly discussed is the Sherman case come from Toronto, CA and while Dr. Jim is not an expert on that case, he is providing information gleaned from public sources where the truth of the matter still remains to be determined.  Nevertheless, an interesting death case where it is alleged that the initial label was a Murder/Suicide and now is a double Murder, still unsolved.  As part of this Dr. Jim is including an audio clip from a news conference that the family’s lawyer addressed about his findings in his investigation.  This information came from CTV News in Canada and the direct link to this news briefing can be found at https://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1524442&jwsource=em.

Dan Levey, an expert victim’s advocate, delves into the many issues the surviving families go through as they continue to live their lives after a tragic death from violence. 

Dr. Adcock will be conducting a follow-up to the previous episodes with Steve Chancellor on Victimology and Gregg McCrary’s on behavioral issues and concerns.  The purpose of this is elaborate further on both topics and provide a couple of case examples to illustrate one element of the behavioral, interpreting the organized versus the disorganized crime scene.

In this episode, Sexual Assault expert and former Sexual Assault Cold Case Unit leader, Jim Markley, will discuss the nuances of the sexual assault problem and how the investigative process will vary from cold case homicides.

Steve Chancellor describes the many characteristics of a victimology assessment that can help the investigator identify the perpetrator.

Dr. Sarah Stein will discuss the results of her research on the White Woman Syndrome and how it is reflected in our society through attitudes exhibited by the news media and others regarding homicides. She will also provide examples that are the direct result of her own personal experiences.

A discussion with former FBI Profiler Gregg McCrary who will talk about the many behavioral elements found in violent crimes and cold cases.  Plus, information about the functions of the FBI Behavioral Science Unit.

In this episode DNA Expert Samantha Spencer will talk to us about the beginnings of DNA and where we are today with the technology.  Included with this will be Familial DNA, Touch DNA, the utilization of Genealogy sites, and why the process takes so long to complete.

About ten years ago Ryann lost his father to violence and the investigation is still unresolved as a cold case. In this interview Ryann freely discusses the emotions and things he went through that occurred as a result of his father’s murder. And, how he has managed to move on in life helping other family members and the police through his non-profit Project Cold Case.

In this episode, Forensic Anthropologist, Erin Kimmerle, PhD, from the University of South Florida, will tell us about the contributions she has made towards solving cold cases from around the country.  In this session the listener will learn how these “bone” experts help the police and other forensic members of the team resolve cold cases.

Tommy McAndrew, a retired Pennsylvania State Police Homicide Detective will talk with us about the many obstacles that he and others across the country are facing as they diligently work to solve cold cases.  A view from behind the scenes of the reality of the situation.

In this episode, Guest Speaker, Chuck Heurich, from the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), will talk to us about the ongoing cold case initiatives from NIJ. For many years Chuck and NIJ and have been sponsoring numerous government programs geared to help our communities and law enforcement agencies combat the problem of unresolved homicides. The contributions by NIJ have significantly raised the bar and our listeners will learn about some of those successes.

The intention of this episode is to explain how the crime data in the USA is collected and reported to the FBI through the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) and the Supplemental Homicide Reports (SHR). Our guest speaker Thomas Hargrove, CEO of the Murder Accountability Project (MAP) located at www.murderdata.org, will discuss the importance of these data and how we should interpret them.  He will also talk about his project of tracking unsolved homicides in the USA while directly relating to the research he has done for police agencies around the country. One such study called “Are Murders Worth Solving? A New Analysis by  MAP” (http://www.murderdata.org/2018/01/are-murders-worth-solving-new-analysis.html), reflects what to some may be obvious but until now not supported by research.  Simply stated, the more homicide cases a homicide unit does not resolve the more incidents of homicide will occur in that jurisdiction, increasing the workload exponentially.  The inverse is: the more you solve, less will occur in the future to become cold cases. 

In 2015 the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) formed the NIJ Cold Case Working Group consisting of 30+ cold case experts from around the country in an effort to formulate a Best Practices Guide for cold case investigations in the USA.  After nearly 4 ½ years the working group settled on the NIJ “National Best Practices for Implementing and Sustaining a Cold Case Investigation Unit” published in July 2019.  (https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/252016.pdf). With the limited time available in one podcast session, we will highlight and attempt to explain the twenty-three (23) recommendations that are made. There is no doubt that this guide should be the leading document regarding cold case investigations in the USA.  Please keep in mind that these are “recommendations” or suggestions, and cannot be mandated by NIJ, DOJ or any other federal government entity.   However, individual law enforcement agencies may, at their choosing, make certain recommendations compulsory within their own individual departments.  Thus – a “guide” of Best Practices for our agencies to consider, incorporate into their police operations and follow so as to reduce the mounting number of unsolved homicides.

Staged Crime Scene Expert Steve Chancellor will define the elements of a staged crime scene and how it affects not only the initial investigation in a hot homicide, but how it can also affect the investigation and outcome of a cold case.

Certified Crime Scene Specialist Grant Graham will join the podcast to discuss the processes and effects of crime scene investigation as it relates to homicides and the nuances of evaluating a cold unresolved case for further investigation. 

In this episode we will discuss the responsibilities of the first responders to the scene of a death; what the assigned detectives need to know and the information to gather; learn about the classifications and the four phases of homicide; and you will be introduced to the “Cold Case Rules” that I put together for investigating unresolved homicides.

In this new episode the listener will learn about how our death investigation system functions.  There are two very strong entities involved with this.  One is the police and their pursuit to investigation violations of the law; and in this case violent acts against people, many becoming homicides. While the other entity are the Coroners and Medical Examiners who are basically the Medico-legal death investigators, but with a different process and set of rules or guidelines to follow. Generally speaking Coroners are elected and Medical Examiners are appointed.  There are approximately 2,200 Coroner offices in the USA while we only have about 450 Medical Examiner offices.  Medical Examiners are usually Forensic Pathologists, while a Coroner can be an MD, most are not and the education level could be as low as just a high school diploma, depending on the state you live in. Medical Examiners and Coroners make cause and manner of death determinations.  The cause of death is the medical reason for the death such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or stab wound to the chest.  But when it comes to determinizing the manner of death   (a legal term) the Coroner/Medical Examiner is tasked to label the death as either a Homicide, Suicide, Accident, Natural or in some cases, Undetermined.  These determinations are based on the international standard for the coding of deaths and should be pretty much the same worldwide. The most critical aspect of this death investigation system is that both the police and the Coroner or Medical Examiner, while separate entities, must work together and communicate their findings to each other so that a proper  and accurate determination is made and if needed, justice is served. The below image/map of the USA illustrates the different systems in our country.  However, if you are more interested in seeing the details you can access the CDC interactive map at:  https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/coroner/death.html

In Episode 2 definitions for “Cold Cases” will be provided along with how the problem  of cold cases has become a crisis.  To accomplish this a piece of research and a historical perspective of homicides during the past decades will be provided. In research conducted by Dr. Jim, he learned from the police agencies who responded to his survey that, 73% of the agencies would declare a case a cold case when there were no more investigative leads; that 20% of them felt that it should be determined bases on the passage of time; while 7% stated that once the original detective had been reassigned or retired, the case would officially then be classified as a cold case.  In actuality it all depends on where you live as each jurisdiction tends to follow different reasoning. As depicted in the below table, one can see that while the number of homicides decreased from 1993 to 2007, the solving of those cases basically remained the same in the 60 percentile range.  So we had about a 40% decrease in the number of homicides with little change in the number solved.  This always begs the question, why?