Stitcher for Podcasts

Get the App Open App
Bummer! You're not a
Stitcher Premium subscriber yet.
Learn More
Start Free Trial
$4.99/Month after free trial
HELP

Show Info

Episode Info

Episode Info: Episode Notes In this episode, we’re discussing the difference between showing and telling in our writing. Why is it important and what can we do about it? It’s a commonly touted piece of advice that we should show rather than tell in our writing but it only goes so far. Advice shouldn’t be followed slavishly at the expense of economy. Sometimes it’s quicker for the reader if we just tell them what is happening. We have to watch out for what might be called stage directions. Excessive turning, standing, walking can be irritating. But visual clues are very useful in moderation. A small action can speak volumes. someone looking away might be lying, but maybe they just can’t face a person or a situation, and In turn, that motivation might be linked to an underlying theme, e.g. A long-buried conflict or a repressed emotion. Stage direction is sometimes necessary to avoid the sense that people flit from place to place. One trick is to say that someone appears at the character’s side. Telling the reader a character’s feelings is often better done through showing, e.g. The dry mouth, the pounding heart. This gives us a chance to play around with the character. People are notoriously bad at understanding their own emotions and motivations. They also lie in order to protect others. Readers know this and will pick up on the clues that you throw down. So if someone says they are fine, the way their knuckles are white as they grip the steering wheel tells a different story. Just to add another note – we should beware of on the nose dialogue: one character over-explaining the plot to another or perhaps spelling out the character’s’ motivation or state of mind. It’s easy to drift into this while trying to show rather than tell, but it isn’t much better. In real life, people are often vague and muddled in their speech, and they react at an emotional level. Unless they’re in a professional role, they may not spell things out calmly. And even then, their relationship with another character will come into play, e.g. are they friends? Does the pathologist share a joke with the detective as they discuss the autopsy? Dialogue can be an economical and interesting way to suggest all kinds of undercurrents, so it’s good to use it rather than squandering it in dull exposition. A note on genres. Some are more tolerant than others. In epic fantasy, readers are happy to plough through a certain amount of worldbuilding. When the quest is everything, a passage of description can work well, but I still think you would be wise to watch out for shoe leather scenes. Perhaps add some action, a significant event, some dialogue, or a thought process. Liven it up. If you find yourself writing “there was” or “there were” or something similar, watch out. The verb to be is weak. e.g. On a hill, there were six standing stones. We could make the stones the subject: The six stones stood on a hill. But even better, put the character there: She ran to the ...
Read more »

Discover more stories like this.

Like Stitcher On Facebook

EMBED

Episode Options

Listen Whenever

Similar Episodes

Related Episodes